The best content is original. Repeatedly re-blogging others content (look at your archives for the last 6 months) indicates you have no original ideas. I remember when Stu’s Shed was ‘great’, now it’s droll. – Sam
It was an interesting comment I received from “Sam” after posting about Michael Turri’s phenomenal work that happened to have been previously mentioned on The Wood Whisperer. Unlike other media, apparently bloggers are only entitled to write original content, and not refer to anything someone else has commented on. Not sure why there are “Press This” and “Reblog” tools available, if not for reposting interesting content found elsewhere (or retweet for the twitterati).
However, if not for my readers this site would not exist, so you tell me what you want.
From Sam’s comment about the last 6 months, I decided to count back. 145 posts. 20 posts that I would regard as re-blogs (or primarily to embed someone else’s YouTube content).
Sam suggested I rename my blog “Wood Whisperer Reblogged”, although there has only been 1 post in the last 6 months. There have been 8 from Lost Art Press (Chris Schwarz’s blog).
So my question is this: are you interested in me reposting interesting content when I find it, or not? If not, it would simply have meant 20 less posts, but the real question is whether you think it degrades the whole site or not when I do so?
And just as an aside, have a look at some other sites, and see how much of their own “original” content they post. And how much advertising they have.
“No original ideas”? Seriously?
Given that I recently passed 2000 posts, and associated comments at that point, I won’t go into all the statistics surrounding the blog again.
However, one is worth mentioning I think:
Stu’s Shed is now 5 years old
Not sure if I expected it to last this long or not – probably hadn’t given it much thought to be honest. Had a look around to see what the sort of normal life expectancy of a blog is, and it seems to be in the order of the average life expectancy of a fruit fly, with the intelligence of one to boot. So if we eliminate them from the equation, the average of those that survive the 8 or so post mark (60-80% lasting a whole month or so) is around 3 years.
So we are doing ok.
Readership has definitely changed, and the site statistics are no longer even close to being accurate, with many choosing to have new posts emailed to them rather than reading them online. Those numbers don’t get counted in the site statistics (nor those who read the site via RSS feeds, or via Twitter etc), but the name of the game is all about the real audience, not some stat counter. The counter currently sits just under 1.5 million visits, the real number would be closer to 1.75 million, but end of the day, who’s counting
I still find it interesting looking back to see what was happening around the shed 2, 3, 5 years ago. It, and this blog are constantly evolving. They may be small changes here and there, but they add up quickly!
So onto another year, and lots more to come.
Since early May, when I added the new widget that maps visitors to the site, there have been visitors from over 100 countries. Cool huh – how amazing that a small shed in the back of beyond of south-east Melbourne suburbs, down-under gets seen all over the world (or is that the global village?) Does that make me the village woodworker, or just the village idiot?
So I’ve now fixed up the “tool of-the-month” page (found under the “Review” tag), the “router bit of-the-month”, and have added the different cuts side-by-side for the “Battle of the Blades” – these are also found under “Review”, then under “Battle of the Blades”. Scroll to the bottom of the list of blades to find the different cuts done in the test, and a link to the related page with all the images of each cut one after the other so you can easily draw whatever conclusions you need.
I’ve also removed the images of the blades that have yet to be written up from the “Battle of the Blades page”, so it is easy to see which reviews have been written. (There are only 3 so far!)
Few things happening inthe background, so if some of the pages suddenly vanish, and others mysteriously appear, don’t be surprised!
I’ve changed the title of Manufacturers and Suppliers to Sources, simply because it is a shorter name. (If you can think of a better one, please say!)
The Tool of-the-month page is being moved to be contained within a new page simply called “Reviews” this section will have the Tool of-the-month, Router Bit of-the-month, the Battle of the Blades, and links to any other reviews that are done. It is completely under construction so you won’t find anything there at the moment.
Another new section that you may be able to see, and might be hidden again temporarily is the Shed Tools section. This is a breakdown of my workshop into main, ancillary, hand-powered, hand-unpowered and portable workshop tools to give you an idea of what a typical workshop can contain, and some of the reasoning behind the decisions I’ve made in choosing the tools therein. That is going to take a while! It will link to the actual tool reviews where relevant.
I’m still working on the tags vs categories concepts to make previous topics easy to find. Again, with over 300 posts already, cataloging the site is important if the info is not to be lost in the detritus.
So bear with me – we will get there. In the meantime, there are 2 new videos coming, as well as the next saw blade review, so there will still be content coming despite the work that is occurring in the background!!
There sure is a lot of time that goes into running a site like this! My hourly rate is Shocking!!!! (What is 1,000 hours x $0/hour?)